3.09.2007

Speedy Gonzalez: The Mexican Sambo



- from the Pittsburgh Post Gazette


Icon of racism gets Mexico's stamp of approval
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
By Tony Norman

"Those of us who grew up with Speedy Gonzales remember him fondly. For many of us, the first lick of Spanish we ever heard was "Andale! Andale! Arriba!" The cartoon mouse with the giant yellow sombrero, overactive libido ("Speedy knows my sister. Speedy knows everybody's sister") and thick accent was the only Mexican other than Zorro Americans were obliged to respect.

The cartoon mice snoozing under sombreros in desolate border towns were our first glimpses of Mexican culture. Looney Tunes portrayed Mexico as a place where tumbleweeds, hiccuping alcoholics and dull-witted mice with toothpicks dangling from their lips were the major export. Would it surprise anyone to learn that some of the vigilantes patrolling the border today carry around many of these images from their formative years?

It seemed to be a place where everyone, including Speedy, engaged in endless siestas until a predatory gringo named Sylvester Pussycat (of "Tweety & Sylvester" fame) came prowling for a dish he could swallow without much preparation. Despite lisping and excessive spitting on his part, Sylvester inadvertently became a metaphor for America's lingering imperialist fantasies of annexation south of the border.

Slowpoke Rodriguez, Speedy's lazy cousin, happily confirmed every negative stereotype of our southern neighbors imaginable, including his well-earned reputation as "the slowest mouse in all Mexico." The heavy drinking of the supporting cast underscored their marginality.
Created in the 1950s, Speedy Gonzales and his friends reflected the cultural biases of animators who couldn't be bothered to think deeply about the humanity of Mexicans. That's how things were done in those days: Paint with as broad a brush as possible, then sit back and laugh. The audience will laugh with you.

Remember Pepe LePew, the French-speaking skunk whose amorous pursuit of female cats he mistook for lady skunks constituted the first animated depictions of sexual harassment? Sure, those cartoons were hilariously xenophobic, but were Pepe's unrequited affections also a sly commentary on postwar Franco-American relations?

Was Pepe LePew a less-than-subtle way of saying that over-perfumed and deodorized Americans believe the French "stink" despite their exaggerated penchant for wine, women and romance? Oh, how the mind boggles at the burden of representation thrust upon cartoons in the last century.

In 1999, Ted Turner ordered the Cartoon Network to take Speedy Gonzales shorts out of rotation because of heightened sensitivity to negative portrayals of Hispanics on television. Hispanics themselves were split over Turner's decision to remove one of the most prominent Hispanics from television altogether, despite his problems.

There are Mexican-Americans who consider Speedy a role model because of his resourcefulness, quick wit and scrappiness, while conceding that his hard-drinking, gun-toting, cat-shooting cousin Slowpoke is a stereotype. No less a revolutionary than the Zapatistas' Subcomandante Marcos compared himself to Speedy Gonzales.

By 2002, Speedy was back on rotation at the Cartoon Network, though banished to obscure time slots overnight. Unlike the notorious Frito Bandito or Dinky, the Taco Bell Chihuahua, Speedy has redeemable qualities most Mexicans want to be identified with.

It's hard to find any redeemable qualities in the big-lipped character at the center of the current imbroglio between the United States and Mexico. Memin Pinguin, the star of a series of Mexican comic books, is indistinguishable from the demeaning coon images that flooded this country during the Jim Crow era. Now Memin is starring in a series of five commemorative stamps issued by the Mexican government.

Memin was created in the 1940s and has remained the most prominent representation of blacks in Mexican pop culture ever since, which tells you everything you need to know about the sensitivity to hoary black stereotypes south of the border.

Memin Pinguin's primary role is to be a childlike foil for the white characters who often chide him about his foolishness. No one growing up in Mexico ever said, "I want to be Memin Pinguin," not even Subcomandante Marcos.

Like his English-speaking cousin Little Black Sambo, Memin represents the distillation of decades of racial hostility into a cartoon image the majority of the population considers "innocuous" and even "cute." The fact that Mexican President Vicente Fox believes the black-faced caricature is an ambassador of his country's racial egalitarianism demonstrates silliness and self-deception on a grand scale.

President Fox and his like-minded compatriots have arrived at the point most white Americans found themselves in the 1950s: willfully ignorant and incapable of perceiving the straightforward logic of an insult not directly addressed to them.

But as bad as the Mexicans are, at least they haven't embraced negative images of blacks to the extent the Japanese have. Mammies, bucks and saucer-lipped stereotypes are still respectable brand icons in Japanese advertisement. Check out "Darkie Toothpaste" (now rechristened "Darlie Toothpaste" after Colgate bought the company and toned down a big-lipped mascot that looked a lot like Memin).

Mexicans love Memin because they "grew up" with him. He's a nonthreatening black boy who has never demanded that they confront their racist assumptions, which is why he has been rewarded with a national stamp. If anything, Memin represents the inability of Mexican liberalism and its progressive classes to engage an obvious insult at the heart of their popular culture.

Memin isn't an African-American problem, he's a Mexican problem. He's a symbol of Mexico's failure of imagination. Blacks in America have enough to deal with without manufacturing outrage over a foreign cartoon character that, arguably, has as much dignity as the gangsta rappers thumping their chests in heavy rotation on BET and MTV.

Mexicans should be accorded the opportunity to have a conversation about Memin without fear of African Americans giving more importance to it than it's worth. We kept Speedy Gonzales, but got rid of Slowpoke Rodriguez, the Frito Bandito and the talking Chihuahua. Perhaps Mexico will figure that it's in its interests to clean house of noxious stereotypes, too."
PEACE!

3.07.2007

Racial 'Bro' Filing

To white people, we all look alike....



3.06.2007

All for the money



Should Andrew Jackson be Removed from the $20 Bill? -By Carrie McLachlan, advanced doctoral student in the Ph.D. Program in American Indian History at UCR focusing on Cherokee cultural history.
Should the image of the Author/Executor of Indian Removal continue to appear on the $20 bill?
Should we continue to honor a man who was insubordinate on several occasions, refusing to honor laws, international treaties, Supreme Court decisions, and the orders of superior officers?
Andrew Jackson threatened to use the power of the United States army against Indian nations who refused to sign removal treaties. Andrew Jackson biographer Robert V. Remini admits that Jackson deliberately used tactics to inspire fear and terror:
"…fear! On more than one occasion Jackson resorted to that tactic to achieve his purposes. And because of his demeanor, shrill voice and "hawk-like" eyes he was a master at terrorizing his victims" (Remini, Andrew Jackson and the Course of American Empire, 1767-1821, 311).
Contemporaries of Jackson denounced him for his tyrannical practices. After Andrew Jackson vetoed the Bank Bill in 1832, killing the National Bank, an unknown artist depicted Jackson as "King Andrew the First" (http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall/treasures_of_congress/Images/page_9/30a.html).
Earlier, 1814-1815, the citizens of New Orleans experienced his tyrannical nature as he held the city under martial law for months after the Battle of New Orleans. Jackson was tried, convicted, and fined $1,000 for contempt of court for refusing to obey a writ of habeas corpus in regard to Jackson’s arrest of Louis Louailler. Robert Remini states:
"… the more the people cried out for a relaxation of the tyranny, the more Jackson turned the screw. Efforts … to organize meetings to protest his violation of their constitutional rights … only invited further repression. … Jackson behaved in a highhanded, bizarre and dangerous manner. Defending a city in the face of clear and imminent danger can justify a multitude of improprieties; Jackson’s present disregard of civil and judicial authority-to say nothing of individual legal and constitutional rights -when he had all but absolute certification that the war was over cannot be justified by any stretch of the imagination (Remini, Course of American Empire, 311-313).
Some people have compared Andrew Jackson’s removal policy with some of Adolph Hitler’s acts of genocide. Hitler’s image has not appeared on German currency. Ward Churchill insists that
"in heroicizing people like … Andrew Jackson … society strongly reinforces the notion that their genocidal conduct was/is an appropriate and acceptable manner in which to attain fame and "immortality." Conversely, placing them where they belong in the historical lexicon-alongside the likes of Attila the Hun and Heinrich Himmler-would tend to convey the opposite message" (A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present, 1997, 251n).

3.02.2007

Chero-free?


Voice of America: Cherokees to vote on Freedmen

Tuesday, February 27, 2007


"Next month, members of the Cherokee Nation will vote on whether to amend the tribal constitution to make Indian blood a requirement for citizenship. American Indian tribes are considered sovereign nations within the United States, and their citizens are entitled to tribal benefits, including subsidized housing and health care.

At issue in the March 3 vote is the status of thousands of descendants of African slaves once owned by tribal members. The people known as Cherokee freedmen say a 140-year-old treaty protects their citizenship in the Cherokee Nation. The story raises questions about Native American identity, race and justice.

The Cherokee tribe has always been one of the largest in the United States. Two centuries ago it was also once one of the wealthiest. Some of its members held more than 100 slaves on plantations in the south. In recent times, though, many Cherokee have lived in deep poverty. That situation is gradually improving, with the success of tribal casinos. Profits from these gambling operations are funding modern health clinics, like one rising from the countryside near Muskogee, Oklahoma.

With the Cherokee's financial picture brightening somewhat and a tribal ruling in their favor, freedmen such as Johnny Toomer, a forklift operator in Muskogee, have reasserted their claim to membership. Toomer says he hasn't been welcomed with open arms. "All I want to be done is done fairly and right. My ancestors received benefits and was done fairly. I want to be done fairly.""




PEACE!